Law and Human Behavior , the official journal of APA Division 41 (American Psychology-Law Society), is a multidisciplinary forum for empirical manuscripts examining the interface between human behavior and the law, the criminal justice and legal system, and the legal process.
The journal publishes original, theory-driven, quantitative and qualitative research from a variety of fields, including law, psychology, psychiatry, criminal justice, political science, sociology, education, and communication. Meta-analytic reviews of previous research results also are encouraged.
Occasionally, the journal publishes methodological or theoretical papers. Although pure legal analysis falls outside the scope of the journal, we strongly encourage authors to situate their research in the law and discuss implications for criminal justice and/or legal policies and practice.
Editor-in-Chief Bradley D. McAuliff, JD, PhD, and the editorial team are seeking submissions on diverse topics, including: forensic treatment, psychopathy, violence risk assessment, bias and discrimination in legal contexts, confessions and interrogation, cultural issues in the law, deception detection, gendered violence, jurors and juries, plea-bargaining, probation, parole, and more. We are looking for articles that deepen our understanding of current issues, as well as articles that expand the scope of inquiry about human behavior in legal contexts.
For a complete list of topics, additional information about the journal, and instructions on how to submit your manuscript, please visit the call for papers page.
One article from each issue of Law and Human Behavior will be highlighted as an “Editor’s Choice” article. Selection is based on the recommendations of the associate editors, the paper’s potential impact to the field, the distinction of expanding the contributors to, or the focus of, the science, or its discussion of an important future direction for science. Editor’s Choice articles are featured alongside articles from other APA published journals in a bi-weekly newsletter and are temporarily made freely available to newsletter subscribers.
Explore journal highlights: free article summaries, editor interviews and editorials, journal awards, mentorship opportunities, and more.
expand all Submission GuidelinesLaw and Human Behavior ® uses a software system to screen submissions for similarity with other published content. The system compares each submission against a database of 25+ million scholarly publications and generates a similarity report for the Editorial Team.
Please submit manuscripts electronically through the Manuscript Submission Portal in Microsoft Word or Open Office format.
Prepare manuscripts according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association using the 7 th edition. Manuscripts may be copyedited for bias-free language (see Chapter 5 of the Publication Manual). APA Style and Grammar Guidelines for the 7 th edition are available.
David DeMatteo, JD, PhD, ABPP (Forensic)
Drexel University, United States
Email
The corresponding author must provide a complete email address because the editorial office handles all correspondence electronically.
Law and Human Behavior uses masked review for all submissions. The cover letter should include all authors’ names and institutional affiliations.
Authors should not include any personal information (name, affiliation, etc.) anywhere in the manuscript. They should mask any clues to their identity, including grant numbers, names of institutions providing IRB approval, self-citations, and links to online repositories for data, materials, code, or preregistrations (e.g., Create a View-only Link for a Project).
This journal is participating in the STM Peer Review Taxonomy Pilot. This pilot aims to identify and standardize definitions and terminology in peer review practices across publishers to help make the peer review process for articles and journals more transparent and enable the community to better assess and compare peer review practices between different journals.
The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:
Prepare manuscripts according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association using the 7th edition. Manuscripts may be copyedited for bias-free language (see Chapter 5 of the Publication Manual).
Review APA’s Journal Manuscript Preparation Guidelines before submitting your article.
Double-space all copy. Other formatting instructions, as well as instructions on preparing tables, figures, references, metrics, and abstracts, appear in the Manual. Instructions regarding the preparation of display equations, computer code, and tables appear at the end of these submission instructions.
Additional guidance on APA Style is available on the APA Style website.
Authors who think that their submission may benefit from additional academic writing or language editing should seek out such services at their host institutions, engage with colleagues and subject matter experts, and/or consider several vendors that offer discounts to APA authors.
Please note that APA does not endorse or take responsibility for the service providers listed. It is strictly a referral service.
Use of such service is not required for publication in an APA journal and does not guarantee selection for peer review, manuscript acceptance, or preference for publication.
Articles are eligible for open science badges recognizing publicly available data, materials, and/or preregistration plans and analyses. These badges are awarded on a self-disclosure basis.
At submission, authors must confirm that criteria have been fulfilled in a signed badge disclosure form (PDF, 42KB) that must be submitted as supplemental material. If the Editorial Team confirms that all criteria have been met, the form will then be published with the article as supplemental material.
Authors should also note their eligibility for the badge(s) in the cover letter.
For all badges, items must be made available on an open-access repository with a persistent identifier in a format that is time-stamped, immutable, and permanent. For the preregistered badge, this is an institutional registration system.
Data and materials must be made available under an open license allowing others to copy, share, and use the data, with attribution and copyright as applicable.
Available badges are:
Open Data:
All data necessary to reproduce the reported results that are digitally shareable are made publicly available. Information necessary for replication (e.g., codebooks or metadata) must be included.
Open Data: Protected Access:
A “PA” (Protected Access) notation may be added to open data badges if sensitive, personal data are available only from an approved third-party repository that manages access to data to qualified researchers through a documented process. To be eligible for an open data badge with such a notation, the repository must publicly describe the steps necessary to obtain the data and detailed data documentation (e.g. variable names and allowed values) must be made available publicly. View a list of approved protected access repositories .
Open Materials:
All materials necessary to reproduce the reported results that are digitally shareable, along with descriptions of non-digital materials necessary for replication, are made publicly available.
Preregistered:
At least one study's design has been preregistered with descriptions of (a) the research design and study materials, including the planned sample size; (b) the motivating research question or hypothesis; (c) the outcome variable(s); and (d) the predictor variables, including controls, covariates, and independent variables. Results must be fully disclosed. As long as they are distinguished from other results in the article, results from analyses that were not preregistered may be reported in the article.
Preregistered+Analysis Plan:
At least one study’s design has been preregistered along with an analysis plan for the research — and results are recorded according to that plan.
Note that it may not be possible to preregister a study or to share data and materials. Applying for open science badges is optional.
On page two, all manuscripts must include a structured abstract (300 words maximum) that has each of the following sections:
Please supply three to five keywords after the abstract. Carefully consider keywords that will help a reader to find and retrieve your article.
Authors must provide 2–3 brief sentences regarding the public significance of their study or meta-analysis. This statement will appear at the end of the Abstract online and in print, and thus augments the Abstract content. There is no need for authors to restate what they did and found—instead they should describe the theoretical and practical implications of their work in language a lay audience will understand. These statements are intended to increase dissemination and use by larger, more diverse audiences.
Examples of Public Significance Statements include
To be maximally useful, these statements of public significance should not simply be sentences lifted directly from the manuscript. They should provide a bottom-line, take-home message that is accurate and easily understood. In addition, they should be able to be translated into media-appropriate statements for use in press releases and on social media. The editorial team will carefully review all Public Significance Statements to make sure they meet these standards prior to final acceptance and publication.
Authors are required to follow the APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards (JARS) for quantitative or qualitative, meta-analysis, and mixed methods research. Updated in 2018, the standards offer ways to improve transparency in reporting to ensure that readers have the information necessary to evaluate the quality of the research and to facilitate collaboration and replication. The new JARS:
JARS-Qual are of use to researchers using qualitative methods like narrative, grounded theory, phenomenological, critical, discursive, performative, ethnographic, consensual qualitative, case study, psychobiography, and thematic analysis approaches. The guidelines focus on transparency in quantitative and mixed methods reporting, recommending descriptions of how the researcher’s own perspective affected the study as well as the contexts in which the research and analysis took place.
Authors should state all sources of financial support for the conduct of the research (e.g., This research was supported by Award XX from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver Institute of Child Health and Human Development) in the author note. If the funding source was involved in any other aspects of the research (e.g., study design, analysis, interpretation, writing), then clearly state the role. If the funding source had no other involvement other than financial support, then simply state that the funding source had no other role other than financial support.
Authors should also provide a conflict of interest statement in the author note disclosing any real or potentially perceived conflict(s) of interest, including financial, personal, or other relationships with other organizations or companies that may inappropriately impact or influence the research and interpretation of the findings. If there are no conflicts of interest, this should be clearly stated.
Authors should provide a data availability statement indicating whether the data, methods used in the analysis, code, and materials used to conduct the research will be made available to any researcher for purposes of reproducing the results or replicating the procedure. In both the author note and at the end of the method section, either specify where that material will be available or note the ethical or legal reasons for not doing so.
Preregistration of studies and analysis plans can be useful for distinguishing confirmatory and exploratory analyses. We encourage researchers to preregister their studies and analysis plans prior to conducting the research (e.g., Open Science Framework, ClinicalTrials.gov). If any aspect of the study is preregistered, include the registry link in the author note.
Authors who have posted their manuscripts to preprint archives, such as PsyArXiv, prior to submission should include a link to the preprint in the author note.
The method section of each manuscript must contain a detailed description of the study participants, including (but not limited to) the following:
The method section also must include a statement describing how informed consent was obtained from the participants (or their parents/guardians), including for secondary use of data if applicable, and indicate that the study was conducted in compliance with an appropriate Internal Review Board (masked for peer-review).
In the method section or supplemental materials, authors should report:
Authors may use StatCheck to detect inconsistencies in the reporting of inferential statistics.
Law and Human Behavior has instituted a policy that data coding needs to be performed by a minimum of two coders for at least 51% (but preferably all) of participants' responses or related qualitative data. Ideally, coders are blind to hypotheses, condition, or any other information that could result in systematic bias. In addition, authors must compute and report reliability statistics that take into account chance agreement (e.g., Cohen’s kappa).
In addition to full-length research papers reporting novel findings, the journal publishes registered reports, negative findings, and replications, regardless of result. Preregistration of replication studies is strongly recommended, but not required.
Registered reports require a two-step review process. The first step is the submission of the registration manuscript. This is a partial manuscript that includes:
The partial manuscript will be reviewed for rigor and methodological approach. If accepted, this amounts to provisional acceptance of the full report regardless of the study’s outcomes. The second step of the process will consist of reviewing the full manuscript for adherence to the registered design (authors must report any deviations in the full manuscript).
List references in alphabetical order. Each listed reference should be cited in text, and each text citation should be listed in the References section.
Examples of basic reference formats:
McCauley, S. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2019). Language learning as language use: A cross-linguistic model of child language development. Psychological Review, 126(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000126
Brown, L. S. (2018). Feminist therapy (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000092-000
Balsam, K. F., Martell, C. R., Jones. K. P., & Safren, S. A. (2019). Affirmative cognitive behavior therapy with sexual and gender minority people. In G. Y. Iwamasa & P. A. Hays (Eds.), Culturally responsive cognitive behavior therapy: Practice and supervision (2nd ed., pp. 287–314). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000119-012
Alegria, M., Jackson, J. S., Kessler, R. C., & Takeuchi, D. (2016). Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES), 2001–2003 [Data set]. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20240.v8
All data, program code and other methods must be appropriately cited in the text and listed in the References section.
Use Word’s Insert Table function when you create tables. Using spaces or tabs in your table will create problems when the table is typeset and may result in errors.
Preferred formats for graphics files are TIFF and JPG, and preferred format for vector-based files is EPS. Graphics downloaded or saved from web pages are not acceptable for publication. Multipanel figures (i.e., figures with parts labeled a, b, c, d, etc.) should be assembled into one file. When possible, please place symbol legends below the figure instead of to the side.
Resolution
Line weights
APA offers authors the option to publish their figures online in color without the costs associated with print publication of color figures.
The same caption will appear on both the online (color) and print (black and white) versions. To ensure that the figure can be understood in both formats, authors should add alternative wording (e.g., “the red (dark gray) bars represent”) as needed.
For authors who prefer their figures to be published in color both in print and online, original color figures can be printed in color at the editor's and publisher's discretion provided the author agrees to pay:
APA can place supplemental materials online, available via the published article in the APA PsycArticles ® database. Please see supplementing your article with online material for more details.
We strongly encourage you to use MathType (third-party software) or Equation Editor 3.0 (built into pre-2007 versions of Word) to construct your equations, rather than the equation support that is built into Word 2007 and Word 2010. Equations composed with the built-in Word 2007/Word 2010 equation support are converted to low-resolution graphics when they enter the production process and must be rekeyed by the typesetter, which may introduce errors.
To construct your equations with MathType or Equation Editor 3.0:
If you have an equation that has already been produced using Microsoft Word 2007 or 2010 and you have access to the full version of MathType 6.5 or later, you can convert this equation to MathType by clicking on MathType Insert Equation. Copy the equation from Microsoft Word and paste it into the MathType box. Verify that your equation is correct, click File, and then click Update. Your equation has now been inserted into your Word file as a MathType Equation.
Use Equation Editor 3.0 or MathType only for equations or for formulas that cannot be produced as Word text using the Times or Symbol font.
Because altering computer code in any way (e.g., indents, line spacing, line breaks, page breaks) during the typesetting process could alter its meaning, we treat computer code differently from the rest of your article in our production process. To that end, we request separate files for computer code.
We request that runnable source code be included as supplemental material to the article. For more information, visit Supplementing Your Article With Online Material.
If you would like to include code in the text of your published manuscript, please submit a separate file with your code exactly as you want it to appear, using Courier New font with a type size of 8 points. We will make an image of each segment of code in your article that exceeds 40 characters in length. (Shorter snippets of code that appear in text will be typeset in Courier New and run in with the rest of the text.) If an appendix contains a mix of code and explanatory text, please submit a file that contains the entire appendix, with the code keyed in 8-point Courier New.
Authors of accepted papers must obtain and provide to the editor on final acceptance all necessary permissions to reproduce in print and electronic form any copyrighted work, including test materials (or portions thereof), photographs, and other graphic images (including those used as stimuli in experiments).
On advice of counsel, APA may decline to publish any image whose copyright status is unknown.
For full details on publication policies, including use of Artificial Intelligence tools, please see APA Publishing Policies.
APA policy prohibits an author from submitting the same manuscript for concurrent consideration by two or more publications.
Authors may post preformatted versions of accepted manuscripts on their personal websites, university, and preprint repositories and author networking sites. The posted manuscript must include a citation and/or link to the final published article.
Published articles that were posted on a preprint archive, such as PsyArXiv, must include a link to the preprint manuscript in the author note. Any press coverage of prepublication manuscripts may preclude press releases by APA’s Public Affairs Office.
APA requires authors to reveal any possible conflict of interest in the conduct and reporting of research (e.g., financial interests in a test or procedure, funding by pharmaceutical companies for drug research).
It is a violation of APA Ethical Principles to publish “as original data, data that have been previously published” (Standard 8.13).
In addition, APA Ethical Principles specify that “after research results are published, psychologists do not withhold the data on which their conclusions are based from other competent professionals who seek to verify the substantive claims through reanalysis and who intend to use such data only for that purpose, provided that the confidentiality of the participants can be protected and unless legal rights concerning proprietary data preclude their release” (Standard 8.14).
APA expects authors to adhere to these standards. Specifically, APA expects authors to have their data available throughout the editorial review process and for at least 5 years after the date of publication.
Authors are required to state in writing that they have complied with APA ethical standards in the treatment of their sample, human or animal, or to describe the details of treatment.
The APA Ethics Office provides the full Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct electronically on its website in HTML, PDF, and Word format. You may also request a copy by emailing or calling the APA Ethics Office (202-336-5930). You may also read “Ethical Principles,” December 1992, American Psychologist, Vol. 47, pp. 1597–1611.
Authors of manuscripts rejected without review may appeal the decision to the editor-in-chief, requesting a reconsideration of the decision. If that appeal is rejected but the author believes the decision is inappropriate, the author may appeal to the Executive Committee of the American Psychology-Law Society (AP-LS), APA Division 41.
An author wishing to appeal a manuscript should direct the editorial appeal first to the associate editor who made the rejection. If the associate editor declines to further consider the manuscript, or the associate editor does a second review of the manuscript and still rejects it, the author may appeal next to the editor-in-chief. If the editor-in-chief believes the appeal has merit, the manuscript may be reassigned to a new associate editor for independent re-review. If the editor-in-chief rejects the appeal, the author may request that the appeal and the manuscript be sent to the Executive Committee of the American Psychology-Law Society (AP-LS), APA Division 41.
See APA’s Publishing Policies page for more information on publication policies, including information on author contributorship and responsibilities of authors, author name changes after publication, the use of generative artificial intelligence, funder information and conflict-of-interest disclosures, duplicate publication, data publication and reuse, and preprints.
Visit the Journals Publishing Resource Center for more resources for writing, reviewing, and editing articles for publishing in APA journals.
Editorial Board(handling all new submissions in 2024)
David DeMatteo, JD, PhD, ABPP (Forensic)
Drexel University, United States
Amanda Bergold, PhD
Marist College, United States
Jennifer Cox, PhD
The University of Alabama, United States
Christopher M. King, JD, PhD
Montclair State University, United States
Jennifer Perillo, PhD
University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, United States
Liana C. Peter-Hagene, PhD
North Central College, United States
Diane Sivasubramaniam, PhD
Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
Ashley Batastini, PhD
University of Memphis, United States
Colleen M. Berryessa, PhD
Rutgers University, United States
Iris Blandon-Gitlin, PhD
California State University, Fullerton, United States
Marcus T. Boccaccini, PhD
Sam Houston State University, United States
Eve M. Brank, JD, PhD
University of Nebraska, Lincoln, United States
Stephanie Brooks Holliday, PhD
RAND Corporation, United States
Jason A. Cantone, JD, PhD
Federal Judicial Center, United States
Steve Charman, PhD
Florida International University, United States
Preeti Chauhan, PhD
John Jay College of Criminal Justice—City University of New York, United States
Deborah A. Connolly, LLB, PhD
Simon Fraser University, Canada
Tarika Daftary-Kapur, PhD
Montclair State University, United States
Amy Bradfield Douglass, PhD
Bates College, United States
Eric B. Elbogen, PhD
Duke University School of Medicine, United States
David L. Faigman, JD, MA
University of California at Hastings, United States
Jaymes Fairfax-Columbo, JD, PhD
Drexel University, United States
Erik J. Girvan, JD, PhD
University of Oregon, United States
Lauren Gonzales, PhD
Columbia University Irving Medical Center, United States
Par Anders Granhag, PhD
University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Thomas Grisso, PhD
University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States
Jennifer Groscup, JD, PhD
Scripps College, United States
Max Guyll, PhD
Arizona State University, United States
Joseph A. Hamm, PhD, MLS
Michigan State University, United States
Jennifer L. Harrison, PhD
Direct Care and Treatment - Forensic Services, United States
Stephen D. Hart, PhD
Simon Fraser University, Canada
Kirk Heilbrun, PhD
Drexel University, United States
Jennifer S. Hunt, PhD
University of Kentucky, United States
Matthew Huss, PhD
Creighton University, United States
Saul Kassin, PhD
John Jay College of Criminal Justice—City University of New York, United States
Lauren E. Kois, PhD
The University of Alabama, United States
Margaret Bull Kovera, PhD
John Jay College of Criminal Justice—City University of New York, United States
Daniel Krauss, JD, PhD
Claremont McKenna College, United States
Casey LaDuke, PhD
John Jay College of Criminal Justice—City University of New York, Mount Sinai Health System, United States
Monica Lawson, PhD
The University of Texas at San Antonio, United States
Amy-May Leach, PhD
University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Canada
Lora Levett, PhD
University of Florida, United States
Kamala London, PhD
University of Toledo, United States
Timothy Luke, PhD
University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Evelyn Maeder, PhD, MLS
Carleton University, Canada
Lindsay Malloy, PhD
University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Canada
Jon Maskály, PhD
University of North Dakota, United States
Bradley D. McAuliff, JD, PhD
California State University, Northridge, United States
Kelly McWilliams, PhD
John Jay College of Criminal Justice—City University of New York, United States
Christian A. Meissner, PhD
Iowa State University, United States
Daniel C. Murrie, PhD
University of Virginia, United States
Cynthia J. Najdowski, PhD
University at Albany, United States
Amanda NeMoyer, JD, PhD
Drexel University, United States
Jennifer H. Peck, PhD
University of Central Florida, United States
Steven D. Penrod, JD, PhD
John Jay College of Criminal Justice—City University of New York, United States
Heather Price, PhD
Thompson Rivers University, Canada
Jodi Quas, PhD
University of California, Irvine, United States
Allison D. Redlich, PhD
George Mason University, United States
Jennifer K. Robbennolt, JD, PhD
University of Illinois, United States
Mary R. Rose, PhD
University of Texas at Austin, United States
Barry Rosenfeld, PhD
Fordham University, United States
Jessica M. Salerno, PhD
Arizona State University, United States
Kyle C. Scherr, PhD
Central Michigan University, United States
Nicholas Schweitzer, PhD
Arizona State University, United States
Nicholas Scurich, PhD
University of California, Irvine, United States
Michael C. Seto, PhD
Royal Ottawa Health Care Group, Canada
Justin T. Sevier, JD, PhD
Florida State University College of Law, United States
Stephane M. Shepherd, PhD
Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
Laura Smalarz, PhD
Arizona State University, United States
Andrew M. Smith, PhD
Iowa State University, United States
Samuel R. Sommers, PhD
Tufts University, United States
Loretta Stalans, PhD
Loyola University Chicago, United States
Jorge G. Varela, PhD
Sam Houston State University, United States
Gina M. Vincent, PhD
University of Massachusetts, Chan Medical School, United States
Aldert Vrij, PhD
University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom
Glenn D. Walters, PhD
Kutztown University, United States
Miko M. Wilford, PhD
University of Massachusetts Lowell, United States
John Wixted, PhD
University of California, San Diego, United States
Yueran Yang, PhD
University of Nevada, Reno, United States
Patricia Zapf, PhD
Palo Alto University, United States
Heather Zelle, JD, PhD
University of Virginia, United States
Nicholas Scurich, PhD
University of California, Irvine, United States
Simone Grisamore, MS
Drexel University, United States
(handling invited revisions only in 2025)
Bradley D. McAuliff, JD, PhD
California State University, Northridge, United States
Jennifer Cox, PhD
The University of Alabama, United States
David DeMatteo, JD, PhD, ABPP
Drexel University, United States
Jennifer S. Hunt, PhD
University of Kentucky, United States
Lora Levett, PhD
University of Florida, United States
Jennifer Perillo, PhD
University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, United States
Kyle C. Scherr, PhD
Central Michigan University, United States
Ashley Batastini, PhD
University of Memphis, United States
Amanda Bergold, PhD
Marist College, United States
Iris Blandon-Gitlin, PhD
California State University, Fullerton, United States
Marcus T. Boccaccini, PhD
Sam Houston State University, United States
Eve M. Brank, JD, PhD
University of Nebraska, Lincoln, United States
Stephanie Brooks Holliday, PhD
RAND Corporation, United States
Jason A. Cantone, JD, PhD
Federal Judicial Center, United States
Steve Charman, PhD
Florida International University, United States
Preeti Chauhan, PhD
John Jay College of Criminal Justice—City University of New York, United States
Deborah A. Connolly, LLB, PhD
Simon Fraser University, Canada
Tarika Daftary-Kapur, PhD
Montclair State University, United States
Amy Bradfield Douglass, PhD
Bates College, United States
Eric B. Elbogen, PhD
Duke University School of Medicine, United States
David L. Faigman, JD, MA
University of California at Hastings, United States
Jaymes Fairfax-Columbo, JD, PhD
Drexel University, United States
Erik J. Girvan, JD, PhD
University of Oregon, United States
Lauren Gonzales, PhD
Columbia University Irving Medical Center, United States
Par Anders Granhag, PhD
University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Thomas Grisso, PhD
University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States
Jennifer Groscup, JD, PhD
Scripps College, United States
Max Guyll, PhD
Arizona State University, United States
Joseph A. Hamm, PhD, MLS
Michigan State University, United States
Stephen D. Hart, PhD
Simon Fraser University, Canada
Kirk Heilbrun, PhD
Drexel University, United States
Matthew Huss, PhD
Creighton University, United States
Saul Kassin, PhD
John Jay College of Criminal Justice—City University of New York, United States
Christopher M. King, JD, PhD
Montclair State University, United States
Lauren E. Kois, PhD
The University of Alabama, United States
Margaret Bull Kovera, PhD
John Jay College of Criminal Justice—City University of New York, United States
Daniel Krauss, JD, PhD
Claremont McKenna College, United States
Casey LaDuke, PhD
John Jay College of Criminal Justice—City University of New York, Mount Sinai Health System, United States
Monica Lawson, PhD
The University of Texas at San Antonio, United States
Amy-May Leach, PhD
University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Canada
Kamala London, PhD
University of Toledo, United States
Timothy Luke, PhD
University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Evelyn Maeder, PhD, MLS
Carleton University, Canada
Lindsay Malloy, PhD
University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Canada
Jon Maskály, PhD
University of North Dakota, United States
Kelly McWilliams, PhD
John Jay College of Criminal Justice—City University of New York, United States
Christian A. Meissner, PhD
Iowa State University, United States
Daniel C. Murrie, PhD
University of Virginia, United States
Cynthia J. Najdowski, PhD
University at Albany, United States
Jennifer H. Peck, PhD
University of Central Florida, United States
Steven D. Penrod, JD, PhD
John Jay College of Criminal Justice—City University of New York, United States
Liana C. Peter-Hagene, PhD
North Central College, United States
Heather Price, PhD
Thompson Rivers University, Canada
Jodi Quas, PhD
University of California, Irvine, United States
Allison D. Redlich, PhD
George Mason University, United States
Jennifer K. Robbennolt, JD, PhD
University of Illinois, United States
Mary R. Rose, PhD
University of Texas at Austin, United States
Barry Rosenfeld, PhD
Fordham University, United States
Jessica M. Salerno, PhD
Arizona State University, United States
Nicholas Schweitzer, PhD
Arizona State University, United States
Nicholas Scurich, PhD
University of California, Irvine, United States
Michael C. Seto, PhD
Royal Ottawa Health Care Group, Canada
Justin T. Sevier, JD, PhD
Florida State University College of Law, United States
Stephane M. Shepherd, PhD
Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
Diane Sivasubramaniam, PhD
Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
Laura Smalarz, PhD
Arizona State University, United States
Andrew M. Smith, PhD
Iowa State University, United States
Samuel R. Sommers, PhD
Tufts University, United States
Loretta Stalans, PhD
Loyola University Chicago, United States
Margaret S. Stockdale, PhD, MLS
Indiana University—Purdue University Indianapolis, United States
Jorge G. Varela, PhD
Sam Houston State University, United States
Gina M. Vincent, PhD
University of Massachusetts, Chan Medical School, United States
Aldert Vrij, PhD
University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom
Glenn D. Walters, PhD
Kutztown University, United States
Miko M. Wilford, PhD
University of Massachusetts Lowell, United States
John Wixted, PhD
University of California, San Diego, United States
Yueran Yang, PhD
University of Nevada, Reno, United States
Kento Yasuhara, PhD
University of New Haven, United States
Patricia Zapf, PhD
Palo Alto University, United States
Heather Zelle, JD, PhD
University of Virginia, United States
Abstracting and indexing services providing coverage of Law and Human Behavior ®
